Jobaaj Stories
Harvard Stands Up to Trump Administration in Major Showdown
Harvard University, the oldest and richest college in the U.S., made a bold move Monday by rejecting key demands from the Trump administration. The decision is being called a turning point in the ongoing struggle over academic freedom.
In a strong statement, Harvard President Alan M. Garber said the university will not allow the federal government to control how it hires staff, admits students, or runs its curriculum. This move is encouraging other colleges that are worried about pressure from Washington.
“This is a big deal,” said J. Michael Luttig, a former federal judge. “It might finally stop the president’s attacks on American institutions.”
Michael Roth, president of Wesleyan University and a rare public critic of the administration, compared it to standing up to a bully. “When someone pushes back, the bully stops,” he said.
Harvard Faces Federal Funding Freeze
Soon after Harvard’s announcement, the federal government said it would freeze $2.2 billion in long-term funding, including a $60 million contract. Harvard receives about $9 billion total in federal support, much of it going to its 11 hospitals in the Boston area, such as Massachusetts General and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.
It’s still unclear which specific programs might be affected by the funding freeze.
Targeting Elite Colleges
The Trump administration is pushing to remove what it calls “woke” politics from universities. It wants colleges to prove they support “viewpoint diversity” by sharing hiring information and allowing outside monitors to check their academic departments.
Last month, Columbia University agreed to the government’s demands after facing the loss of $400 million in federal support. Harvard, however, is refusing to back down.
“No private university should be taken over by the federal government,” President Garber wrote.
The administration sees Harvard as a symbol of elite liberalism. Officials believe a legal fight with such a high-profile school could help them promote their view that colleges are biased and limit free speech.
Critics Call Demands Unfair
Steven Pinker, a well-known professor at Harvard, said forcing “viewpoint diversity” on departments makes no sense.
“Will the government make medical schools hire homeopaths? Or psychology departments hire Jungians?” he asked. “That’s not how education works.”
Harvard has faced criticism since the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attacks in Israel, like many universities. Garber said the school is working to combat antisemitism, support free speech, and protect diverse opinions.
Legal Pushback from Harvard
Harvard’s legal team, which includes William Burck and Robert Hur, wrote a letter to the government rejecting the administration’s overreach. They said the university is open to honest discussions but won’t agree to anything outside the law.
Burck and Hur both worked with the Trump administration in the past, so they understand the political and legal dynamics. Their message was clear: Harvard won’t give up its independence.
Political Reaction
Rep. Elise Stefanik, a Republican from New York and a Harvard alum, blasted the university on social media. She called it a sign of what she described as “academic rot” and demanded Congress cut off taxpayer funding.
The administration may still take more action against Harvard, such as investigating its nonprofit status or targeting visas for international students.
Ted Mitchell, head of the American Council on Education, praised Harvard’s stand.
“If Harvard hadn’t spoken up,” he said, “other schools would’ve been too afraid to do so.”
