Julia Hartley-Brewer faced intense criticism for comparing the upskirting of Narinder Kaur by Laurence Fox to a handbag theft, sparking outrage and highlighting the seriousness of upskirting.


Newsletter

wave

Julia Hartley-Brewer Slammed for Downplaying Narinder Kaur Upskirting Case

Broadcaster Julia Hartley-Brewer ignited a firestorm of criticism after comparing the upskirting of Narinder Kaur to a handbag theft. The controversy erupted following the news that actor Laurence Fox was charged with sharing an upskirting image of Kaur, leading Hartley-Brewer to draw a controversial parallel on social media.

The Incident and Backlash

Following an 11-month investigation, Fox was charged with a sexual offence for posting a compromising image of Kaur on social media in April 2024. Kaur, who waived her right to anonymity, previously described the incident as "unimaginably mortifying." Hartley-Brewer, however, responded to the news by tweeting about her own handbag theft, comparing the police response times. This sparked immediate outrage, with many accusing her of victim-shaming and trivializing a serious sexual offense. Users on X, formerly Twitter, criticized her attempt to equate a personal property crime with the violation of Kaur's privacy and dignity. Hartley-Brewer's defense, that she was comparing the policing of different crimes, did little to quell the backlash.

Understanding Upskirting and Cyberflashing

Upskirting, the act of taking a picture under someone's clothing without consent, is a serious crime. Fox's actions fall under Section 66A of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which criminalizes the sharing of sexual images without consent, intending to cause alarm, distress, or humiliation. This reflects growing concerns around cyberflashing and online sexual harassment.

The Key Players

Narinder Kaur, a broadcaster known for appearances on Good Morning Britain and GB News, has become a prominent voice in this controversy. Laurence Fox, the actor facing charges, is known for his outspoken views and controversial past. Julia Hartley-Brewer's insensitive comparison brought further attention to the case, highlighting the complexities of public discourse surrounding sexual offenses.

Conclusion

Hartley-Brewer's comments underscore the ongoing need for greater sensitivity and understanding when discussing sexual assault and online harassment. The case highlights the gravity of upskirting and the importance of supporting victims. Fox's upcoming court appearance will be a significant development in this ongoing story.

FAQ

Hartley-Brewer controversially compared the upskirting of Narinder Kaur by Laurence Fox to a handbag theft, minimizing the severity of the sexual assault. This sparked widespread criticism for downplaying the seriousness of upskirting and its impact on victims.

Her comparison trivialized upskirting, a serious form of sexual harassment that violates a person's privacy and bodily autonomy. Many felt her remarks demonstrated a lack of understanding of the gendered violence inherent in the act and showed insensitivity towards victims.

Narinder Kaur is the victim of upskirting committed by Laurence Fox. Her case highlighted the vulnerability women face to this form of sexual harassment and the importance of recognizing it as a serious offense.

Upskirting is the act of taking photographs or videos under someone's clothing without their consent, specifically targeting their genitals or underwear. It is a criminal offense because it is a violation of privacy, a form of sexual harassment, and can cause significant emotional distress to the victim.

Hartley-Brewer's comments have been met with widespread outrage and criticism. Many have condemned her remarks as misogynistic and insensitive, highlighting the need for greater understanding and awareness of the impact of sexual harassment. There has been significant media backlash and public debate.

Search Anything...!