Jobaaj Stories
AEC Clears Gazette News Amidst Coalition Accusations
The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) has dismissed claims by the Coalition that Gazette News, a local news outlet, was a Teal-funded publication designed to manipulate voters. This decision follows a formal complaint filed by Liberal Senator Jane Hume on March 11th, alleging Gazette News was funded by Climate 200 to promote progressive independent candidates. The AEC’s thorough investigation concluded that Gazette News’ content did not constitute “electoral matter” and thus did not require authorization.
AEC Investigation and Findings
The AEC's statement, released on March 27th, emphasized that the Electoral Act excludes news reporting and genuine editorial content from the definition of "electoral matter." Furthermore, the AEC found no evidence that Gazette News incurred electoral expenditure requiring registration as a financial disclosure entity. This vindication was welcomed by Gazette News CEO Anna Saulwick, who denounced the complaint as a "nasty, false political stunt" aimed at silencing independent media.
The Coalition's Allegations
The Coalition's accusations stemmed from the fact that three major Gazette News backers—Matt Doran, James Taylor, and Mark Rawson—have donated significant sums to Climate 200 and affiliated candidates. While Senator Hume and other Coalition members pointed to Gazette News' allegedly favorable coverage of Teal candidates and critical coverage of Coalition policies, Gazette News maintained its editorial independence. Climate 200 founder Simon Holmes à Court also denied any link between his organization and Gazette News.
Gazette News' Response and Future
Gazette News, with outlets across Victoria and NSW, has consistently covered various candidates and issues. While providing coverage of independent candidates, it also included articles on candidates from other political parties. Saulwick asserted that "there will always be politicians who don’t like scrutiny." The AEC's decision clears Gazette News of any wrongdoing, allowing its journalists to continue their work without intimidation.
Key Takeaways
The AEC's decision highlights the importance of distinguishing between legitimate news reporting and political advertising. The case also underscores the potential for political parties to leverage accusations of bias against independent media outlets. Ultimately, the AEC's findings reaffirm the necessity of a free and independent press to hold power accountable.
