Blogs
Mardul Sharma

Author

  • Published: Apr 11 2025 02:10 PM
  • Last Updated: May 29 2025 11:49 AM

The SAVE Act, mandating in-person citizenship proof for voter registration, faces criticism for its high cost, potential disenfranchisement of millions, and focus on suppressing votes rather than preventing fraud.


Newsletter

wave

The SAVE Act: A Real Threat to Voting?

Okay, so you probably heard about the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act. The House passed it back in April 2025, and honestly? It’s sparked a huge debate, and for good reason. This bill basically says you need to prove your citizenship in person to register to vote. That sounds simple enough, right? But it's way more complicated than it seems.

A Really Big Price Tag

Orange County’s election officials estimated it would cost them over $6 million a year to implement this thing. That’s just *one* county! We're talking hiring and training tons of new staff, finding more office space – the works. And get this: the bill doesn't provide any extra federal money to help pay for it. So, local governments already struggling to run elections are now expected to find millions more? It's insane.

Who Gets Hurt the Most?

Millions of Americans don’t have easy access to the documents this bill requires – birth certificates, passports, you name it. This disproportionately affects people in marginalized communities: older voters, young adults, people in rural areas, women who’ve changed their names… the list goes on. The Brennan Center for Justice estimates over 21 million people lack easy access to proof of citizenship. Plus, requiring in-person proof kills the convenience of online and mail-in registration – adding yet another hurdle.

Is This Really About Preventing Fraud?

Critics argue this whole thing isn’t about preventing voter fraud (which, let's be real, is incredibly rare). It feels more like an attempt to suppress votes. Limiting mail-in ballots and throwing criminal penalties at election officials who make honest mistakes? It just exacerbates the problem. The potential to disenfranchise millions of eligible voters is a massive threat to our democracy. It’s a slippery slope, and it’s worrying.

What Happens Next? And What Can We Do?

The SAVE Act is facing a tough road in the Senate. Even with a Republican majority, getting enough votes to overcome a filibuster is a long shot. But this whole thing raises a huge question: how do we balance fair, accessible voting with election integrity? It feels like we’re stuck between a rock and a hard place. The answer isn’t to make it harder for people to vote. This is where you come in. Contact your senators – tell them to oppose this bill. Our democracy depends on it. Don't let this one slip by.

FAQ

The SAVE Act is proposed legislation requiring in-person verification of citizenship for voter registration. Critics argue this is a costly and ineffective way to combat voter fraud, disproportionately impacting marginalized communities.

The SAVE Act is projected to disenfranchise millions of eligible voters, particularly those lacking easy access to in-person registration or the necessary documentation. The exact number is debated, but estimates are in the millions.

Opponents argue the SAVE Act's requirements create unnecessary barriers to voting, particularly for elderly, disabled, low-income, and minority voters. The focus on in-person verification, they say, is a tactic to suppress turnout, rather than a genuine effort to combat fraud.

Cost analysis estimates for the SAVE Act vary, but implementation is expected to be extremely expensive, including costs associated with new infrastructure, personnel, and potential legal challenges. These costs are a significant point of contention.

Proponents argue the SAVE Act enhances election integrity by ensuring only eligible citizens vote. They claim stricter verification is necessary to maintain faith in the democratic process, despite concerns about the disproportionate impact on certain groups and the high costs involved.

Search Anything...!