Jobaaj Stories
China Tests Non-Nuclear Hydrogen Bomb Using Magnesium Hydride
China has tested a new kind of powerful explosive that doesn’t use nuclear material. This weapon, called a non-nuclear hydrogen bomb, is seen as a major breakthrough in military technology. The test was carried out by the 705 Research Institute, a part of China State Shipbuilding Corporation, and is being closely watched by global defense experts.
What Is a Non-Nuclear Hydrogen Bomb?
Unlike traditional nuclear bombs that use radioactive elements to create massive explosions, this new bomb uses a chemical compound called magnesium hydride. When heated, magnesium hydride reacts with air to produce hydrogen gas. This gas then catches fire and creates a large explosion, similar in effect to some nuclear weapons but without the dangerous radiation.
How Powerful Is the Explosion?
According to reports, the bomb created a fireball that reached temperatures above 1,000°C (1,832°F). The fireball lasted over two seconds—about 15 times longer than a TNT explosion of the same size. Scientists believe the long-lasting fireball could increase damage, especially in enclosed spaces like bunkers or tunnels.
Why Is This Development Important?
This test marks a major shift in how countries could develop weapons in the future. Because it doesn’t use nuclear material, the weapon avoids international treaties and bans that apply to nuclear arms. This could give countries like China a strategic edge without the political and environmental risks that come with radioactive weapons.
Is It Really Not Nuclear?
That’s right. Despite being called a hydrogen bomb, this version doesn’t rely on nuclear fusion, which is the reaction used in true hydrogen bombs. Instead, it creates a powerful blast through chemical energy. That makes it technically non-nuclear, even though the effects may be similar in certain situations.
Military and Global Reactions
While China has not officially confirmed the test, the scientific paper outlining the experiment has been reviewed by international researchers. Military experts believe this could change the future of warfare, especially if more countries adopt similar technology. It may also spark debates about how international arms agreements should evolve to include non-nuclear but high-impact weapons.
