El Salvador's Bukele Proposes Prisoner Exchange with Venezuela Amid U.S. Deportation Controversy
In a bold diplomatic move, El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele has proposed a prisoner exchange to Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. Bukele suggests repatriating 252 Venezuelans deported from the U.S. and currently detained in El Salvador in exchange for the release of an equal number of political prisoners held in Venezuela.
Background of the Proposal
The individuals in question were deported from the United States under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, a wartime law invoked by the Trump administration to expedite the removal of non-citizens deemed threats to national security. Many of these deportees are accused of affiliations with the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, though evidence supporting these claims is limited .
Upon arrival in El Salvador, the deportees were incarcerated in the country's high-security Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT). Human rights organizations have raised concerns about the conditions and legality of their detention, noting that many have not been formally charged or provided access to legal representation.
Details of the Proposed Exchange
Bukele's proposal includes the release of high-profile political prisoners in Venezuela, such as journalist Roland Carreño, human rights lawyer Rocío San Miguel, and Corina Parisca de Machado. Additionally, the proposal encompasses nearly 50 detainees of other nationalities, including U.S., German, and French citizens.
The Salvadoran president frames the initiative as a humanitarian effort aimed at correcting injustices and fostering diplomatic goodwill. However, the Venezuelan government has yet to respond officially, and its prosecutor's office has condemned the proposal, labeling it "cynical" and accusing Bukele of committing crimes against humanity by detaining the deportees.
U.S. Legal and Political Repercussions
The deportations have sparked legal challenges in the United States. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit arguing that the deported individuals were denied due process. The U.S. Supreme Court temporarily halted further deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, emphasizing the need for judicial review before such actions.
Despite the court's intervention, the Trump administration proceeded with the deportations, leading to accusations of defying judicial authority. This situation has intensified debates over the use of wartime laws in immigration enforcement and the balance of powers between the executive and judiciary branches .