Jobaaj Stories
👀 Putin’s Hidden Family: Telegram Leak Sparks Global Curiosity
In a move that’s shaken Russian social media and international observers alike, photos allegedly showing President Vladimir Putin’s 10-year-old son, Ivan, were leaked online by an anonymous anti-Kremlin Telegram channel. The channel, active for months posting insider claims, vanished mysteriously minutes after the images were posted.
This has ignited global speculation around the boy’s identity, security concerns, and the Kremlin’s control over digital dissent.
📸 What Do We Know About the Leaked Photos?
The now-deleted Telegram post included two blurred but high-resolution images of a young boy, described as Ivan, believed to be Putin’s secret child from a long-rumored relationship with former gymnast Alina Kabaeva.
In the photos, the boy appears at a private estate with heavy security detail — possibly a Putin residence. Facial recognition experts on social media claimed strong resemblance with the Russian President.
However, since the channel is deleted and no official source has confirmed the boy's identity, these remain unverified leaks.
🧨 The Telegram Channel That Started It All — Gone!
The leak was made by a Telegram channel with over 200K followers, known for posting anti-Kremlin content, including military desertion videos and insider political gossip. Within 15 minutes of posting the photos, the channel:
-
Deleted the original post
-
Disappeared completely — username shows “deleted account”
-
Comments across Telegram hint at possible Kremlin cyber-intervention
Some claim the user was "silenced"; others suggest self-deletion to avoid legal consequences under Russia’s tightening cyber laws.
🕵️ Why Is This a Big Deal?
Putin has always kept his personal life private, and even official Russian media rarely show his daughters. The Kremlin has never acknowledged Ivan’s existence.
But this leak, if real, could:
-
Undermine Putin’s crafted strongman image
-
Expose weaknesses in digital censorship
-
Stir international debate on political hypocrisy and authoritarian control
📵 Kremlin's Response?
So far, no official response from the Kremlin. Russian state media has ignored the leak, as expected.
However, some pro-government Telegram channels dismissed it as “Western propaganda” and called the boy a "random child" staged to defame Russia.
Western journalists, meanwhile, are working to verify the legitimacy of the image through metadata and source tracing.
🔐 Is Telegram Safe for Whistleblowers Anymore?
This incident has reignited a long-standing debate: Is Telegram really a safe space for dissent in Russia?
Despite its encrypted messaging features, the sudden takedown hints that Russia may have deep visibility or access to channels that challenge the state.
