🚨 Public safety meets civil liberty debate as Denver shuts down Flock camera system
City Council Votes Unanimously to Reject Extension
The Denver City Council has voted 12-0 to stop the expansion of its license plate reader camera program after Mayor Mike Johnston's office withdrew support for a proposed $666,000 contract extension with Flock Group Inc.
The decision ends a two-year contract that would have allowed 111 automatic license plate readers (ALPRs) to continue operating at around 70 intersections across the city.
Why the Cameras Were Controversial
While the devices were credited for helping reduce car thefts by nearly 40% and even helped solve a jewelry heist in April, growing fears over data privacy and immigration enforcement tipped the balance against them.
The cameras stored data for 30 days and shared access with over 80 law enforcement agencies, including some that work closely with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Immigration and Civil Rights Worries
Council members voiced concern that such surveillance could be weaponized in today’s political climate.
“This technology is a gift to anyone looking to target activists or immigrants,” warned Council Member Sarah Parady.
She added that while Denver police don't cooperate with ICE, agencies like the El Paso County Sheriff—not bound by sanctuary policies—still do.
Council Member Chris Hines echoed the sentiment, stating:
“We must ensure full transparency and meaningful oversight. Public safety should never come at the cost of civil liberties.”
Mayor’s Office Backs Away from the Contract
Initially in favor of renewing the contract, the mayor's office changed its stance just before the vote.
In a statement, they acknowledged a shift in public sentiment since the program began in early 2024:
“There are new community concerns surrounding this technology,” the mayor’s spokesperson noted.
What's Next for the Program?
Though the city rejected the expansion, the pilot program remains active for now.
The mayor’s office plans to create a task force to evaluate the broader use of surveillance technology and address ongoing privacy concerns.
Conclusion
Denver’s decision to halt the expansion of its license plate reader cameras marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate between public safety and civil liberties. While the cameras were credited with reducing crime, concerns over privacy, data misuse, and potential immigration enforcement prompted the City Council to take a stand. As surveillance technology continues to evolve, future decisions will need to balance safety with transparency and accountability.
