Blogs
Nikhil Singh

Author

  • Published: Apr 07 2025 05:28 PM
  • Last Updated: May 29 2025 07:58 PM

Jitesh Sharma's leg bye was disallowed after an overturned LBW decision in an IPL 2025 match, sparking debate about the ICC rule voiding runs before a reversed out decision, despite the controversy Sharma had a stellar innings.


Newsletter

wave

Jitesh Sharma's Controversial Leg Bye: A Seriously Weird IPL Moment

Okay, so you wouldn't believe what happened in that RCB vs. MI IPL 2025 match. Total nail-biter, right down to the wire. Jitesh Sharma, batting on the last ball, gets whacked on the pads. LBW shout! Umpire says out. Whoa.

But wait, there's more. Sharma goes for the DRS review. And guess what? The impact was outside off stump! Not out! The crowd goes wild. RCB fans are celebrating. Except...there's a twist.

The Run That Wasn't a Run

Before the review, Sharma had scampered a leg bye. A single run, a tiny, seemingly inconsequential run. But because the umpire initially called him out, that leg bye? Poof! Gone. Vanished. The umpire ruled the ball dead the second he gave Sharma out, even though the decision was overturned. Talk about a rollercoaster!

Rules, Rules, Rules (and Why They're Maddening)

According to the ICC rulebook – and yes, I looked it up – a ball becomes dead the second an umpire calls someone out. Doesn't matter if the decision gets reversed later. So, any runs scored before the reversal? They simply don't count. It happened before, too, in the South Africa vs. Bangladesh T20 World Cup match last year. Crazy, right?

It's one of those rules that makes perfect sense on paper, but when you see it play out in a crucial moment like that final ball, it feels...well, it feels pretty brutal. Especially considering how close that match was. One run could have made all the difference!

Hanuma Vihari Weighs In

Even Hanuma Vihari chimed in on social media. He was totally baffled, and I don’t blame him. He tweeted about how unfair it felt, especially in a tight finish. He's absolutely right – in a close game, a single run is HUGE. His comments got a lot of people talking about possibly changing the rule. It's a valid point, isn't it?

Sharma's Stellar Show (Despite the Injustice)

Despite all the drama, let's not forget Sharma's incredible innings. An unbeaten 40 off 19 balls? Seriously impressive. He played a vital role in getting RCB to a strong 221/5. He, Kohli, and Patidar totally smashed it. Then there was that dropped catch with Dayal...the whole evening was crazy!

The Aftermath: A Rule in Need of Review?

The whole Jitesh Sharma incident really shines a light on this super tricky rule. The rules are clear, yes, but applying them feels...unfair at times. It's a frustrating situation, and the debate it sparked definitely isn't going away anytime soon. What do you think? Should the rule be changed?

FAQ

During an IPL 2025 match, Jitesh Sharma was initially given a leg bye. However, an LBW decision was reviewed using DRS and overturned. The ICC rules state that runs scored before a reversed out decision are voided, leading to the leg bye being disallowed, causing controversy.

This is due to an ICC rule which states that any runs scored *before* an LBW decision is overturned using DRS are nullified. Even though Sharma was not ultimately given out, the leg bye was deemed to have occurred before the reversal and was therefore canceled.

The controversy stems from the perceived unfairness of voiding runs scored before a successful DRS appeal that ultimately didn't result in a dismissal. Many feel the rule needs clarification or amendment to avoid such situations.

Despite the controversial leg bye incident, Jitesh Sharma had an excellent innings, showcasing his batting prowess. The details of his score are not available from this summary but he clearly delivered a strong performance.

The Decision Review System (DRS) allows teams to challenge umpiring decisions. In this case, an LBW decision was overturned through DRS. However, the controversy arises from the application of the ICC rule regarding runs scored before an overturned out decision.

Search Anything...!