Blogs
Nikhil Singh

Author

  • Published: Apr 07 2025 05:28 PM
  • Last Updated: May 22 2025 06:29 PM

Jitesh Sharma's leg bye was disallowed after an overturned LBW decision in an IPL 2025 match, sparking debate about the ICC rule voiding runs before a reversed out decision, despite the controversy Sharma had a stellar innings.


Newsletter

wave

Jitesh Sharma's Controversial Leg Bye: A Case of Dead Ball in IPL 2025

In a thrilling IPL 2025 match between RCB and MI, a controversial incident involving Jitesh Sharma sparked debate about the rules of the game. Sharma, batting on the final ball, was initially given out LBW but successfully overturned the decision via DRS. However, despite being declared not out, the leg bye he'd run before the review was disallowed, leaving RCB and fans questioning the ruling.

What Happened on the Final Ball?

Jasprit Bumrah bowled a yorker, and Sharma, attempting a shot, was struck on the pads. A leg bye was initially signaled, but the umpire declared Sharma out. The DRS review showed the impact was outside off stump, overturning the LBW decision. Despite being not out, the umpire ruled the ball dead, invalidating the run.

The Rules and the Controversy

According to ICC rules, a ball becomes dead the moment a batter is given out. This is true regardless of whether the 'out' decision is later overturned. Since Sharma was initially given out, any runs scored before the reversal of the decision are void. This rule has led to similar controversies before, such as in the South Africa vs. Bangladesh T20 World Cup match in 2024. The non-awarded run in this close encounter underscores how crucial the ruling is, potentially altering the final outcome of a game.

Hanuma Vihari's Reaction

Indian cricketer Hanuma Vihari voiced his concern on social media, questioning the fairness of the rule. He highlighted the potential for such rulings to dramatically impact close matches, especially in the second innings where a single run could decide victory or defeat. His comments highlight a growing debate within the cricketing community about whether a rule change might be necessary for greater clarity and fairness.

Beyond the Leg Bye: Sharma's Stellar Innings

Despite the controversy, Sharma had an impressive innings, scoring an unbeaten 40 off 19 balls in RCB's impressive total of 221/5. He showcased his capabilities as a powerful finisher, adding to an already excellent display from Kohli and Patidar. This match provided further evidence of Sharma's growth as a dynamic cricketer. He was later involved in a dropped catch with Dayal further highlighting the evening's dramatic ups and downs for the team.

Conclusion

The Jitesh Sharma incident highlights a complex and controversial rule within cricket's DRS system. While the rules are clear, the practical application can feel unfair. The debate sparked by this game and players like Vihari is sure to continue. What are your thoughts on this controversial rule? Share your opinion below!

FAQ

During an IPL 2025 match, Jitesh Sharma was initially given a leg bye. However, an LBW decision was reviewed using DRS and overturned. The ICC rules state that runs scored before a reversed out decision are voided, leading to the leg bye being disallowed, causing controversy.

This is due to an ICC rule which states that any runs scored *before* an LBW decision is overturned using DRS are nullified. Even though Sharma was not ultimately given out, the leg bye was deemed to have occurred before the reversal and was therefore canceled.

The controversy stems from the perceived unfairness of voiding runs scored before a successful DRS appeal that ultimately didn't result in a dismissal. Many feel the rule needs clarification or amendment to avoid such situations.

Despite the controversial leg bye incident, Jitesh Sharma had an excellent innings, showcasing his batting prowess. The details of his score are not available from this summary but he clearly delivered a strong performance.

The Decision Review System (DRS) allows teams to challenge umpiring decisions. In this case, an LBW decision was overturned through DRS. However, the controversy arises from the application of the ICC rule regarding runs scored before an overturned out decision.

Search Anything...!