The 2025 NCAA tournament generated billions, yet players remain unpaid. While the women's tournament saw record viewership and increased revenue sharing, significant financial disparity with the men's persists, prompting calls for athlete compensation.


Newsletter

wave

March Madness 2025: A Billion-Dollar Game with Unpaid Players?

The 2024 men's NCAA tournament raked in a staggering $1.38 billion, attracting 33.69 million viewers. The championship game alone saw 14.82 million tune in to watch UConn defeat Purdue. But the real shock? The women's final, South Carolina versus Iowa, captivated a record-breaking 18.87 million viewers – the most watched women's or men's basketball game since 2019. This explosive growth begs the question: who gets the money?

The Multi-Billion Dollar Machine

Behind the spectacle is an $8.8 billion media rights deal between CBS and Turner, extending until 2032. Yet, the athletes generating this revenue receive no direct payment from the NCAA. Instead, the money flows to conferences via a "unit" system. In 2024, men's tournament games distributed $226 million through this system, with conferences receiving roughly $2 million per game (excluding the championship). For example, the SEC, with 17 games played, pocketed approximately $34 million. This stands in stark contrast to the women's tournament, where a unit was only worth about $113,000 in 2025. Even though this is a massive step towards equity, the difference highlights a significant financial gap. A team making the Final Four earns around $1.26 million for its conference in the women's tournament versus $8 million in the men's. The media rights disparity reflects this gap: CBS and TNT pay roughly $1.1 billion annually for the men's tournament, while ESPN pays just $65 million for the women's.

The Changing Landscape

Change is underway, though. The introduction of a unit system for women's teams and the allowance of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals are major strides towards fairness. While the 2025 women's tournament will see conferences receiving 26% of the TV deal, a figure that will rise to 41% by year three, totaling $25 million, the athletes themselves still don't get a direct cut from the NCAA. The pending $2.78 billion class-action settlement on athlete compensation could further reshape this landscape.

2025 March Madness: A Turning Point?

With record viewership and growing revenue, 2025 is shaping up to be a pivotal year. Will the women's game finally break the bank and achieve financial parity with the men's? The answer remains uncertain, but the shift towards equity and the incredible viewership numbers suggest a more inclusive future. As the 2025 men’s championship game between Florida and Houston approaches, the question of fair compensation for athletes remains at the forefront of the conversation.

FAQ

The 2025 NCAA tournament generated billions of dollars in revenue. Exact figures vary depending on the source, but it's clear the event is incredibly lucrative.

The NCAA's long-standing amateurism rules prohibit direct payment to athletes. However, this is increasingly contested, particularly given the massive profits generated by the tournaments.

While the women's tournament saw record viewership and increased revenue sharing in 2025, a significant financial gap still exists between the men's and women's tournaments. The men's tournament generates considerably more revenue.

NIL stands for Name, Image, and Likeness. Recent changes allow college athletes to profit from their name, image, and likeness through endorsements and sponsorships, offering some compensation, though not directly from the NCAA.

Arguments for paying players center on fairness given the substantial revenue generated by their athletic performance, the exploitation of unpaid labor, and the need to address the existing gender pay gap. Proponents highlight the players' contribution to the success of the tournament.

Search Anything...!