Blogs
Nikhil Singh

Author

  • Published: Apr 07 2025 05:16 AM
  • Last Updated: May 29 2025 11:49 AM

The 2025 NCAA tournament generated billions, yet players remain unpaid. While the women's tournament saw record viewership and increased revenue sharing, significant financial disparity with the men's persists, prompting calls for athlete compensation.


Newsletter

wave

March Madness 2025: Big Bucks, But Who's Getting Paid?

Okay, so March Madness 2024 was HUGE. The men's tournament? A mind-boggling $1.38 billion in revenue! Thirty-three point six nine million viewers tuned in. Seriously. And the championship game alone? Fourteen point eight two million people watched UConn beat Purdue. But here's the kicker: the women's final, South Carolina versus Iowa, smashed ALL the records with 18.87 million viewers – the most watched women's or men's game since 2019! Honestly, who saw that coming?

A Billion-Dollar Machine…Run By Whom?

This whole thing is powered by an $8.8 billion media rights deal between CBS and Turner, locked in until 2032. Think about that for a second. Eight point eight billion. But the athletes actually playing the games? They don't see a direct dime from the NCAA. The money flows to the conferences through this complicated "unit" system. In 2024, the men's tournament distributed $226 million this way. Conferences got roughly $2 million per game (not including the championship). The SEC, for example, with 17 games, raked in around $34 million. But the women's tournament? A unit was worth about $113,000 in 2025. A massive step towards equity, sure, but there’s still a HUGE difference. A women's team in the Final Four earns around $1.26 million for its conference versus $8 million for a men's team. This money gap is mirrored in the TV deals too: CBS and TNT pay roughly $1.1 billion annually for the men's tournament, compared to ESPN’s $65 million for the women's.

Things Are Changing…Slowly

Things are shifting, though. The introduction of a unit system for the women's teams and the allowance of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals are huge steps forward. The 2025 women's tournament will see conferences getting 26% of the TV deal, rising to 41% by year three, totaling $25 million. Still, the players themselves are not directly compensated by the NCAA. And then there's that pending $2.78 billion class-action settlement on athlete compensation… that could totally shake things up. It’s kinda like watching a slow-motion trainwreck – you know something big is coming, but you’re not quite sure what form it’ll take.

2025: A Tipping Point?

With these record viewership numbers and all this money swirling around, 2025 is shaping up to be a big year. Will the women's game finally achieve true financial parity with the men's? It’s still up in the air. But the push for equity, along with these insane viewership numbers, suggests a more inclusive future is on the horizon. As the 2025 men’s championship game between Florida and Houston approaches, the conversation about fair compensation for athletes is louder than ever.

FAQ

The 2025 NCAA tournament generated billions of dollars in revenue. Exact figures vary depending on the source, but it's clear the event is incredibly lucrative.

The NCAA's long-standing amateurism rules prohibit direct payment to athletes. However, this is increasingly contested, particularly given the massive profits generated by the tournaments.

While the women's tournament saw record viewership and increased revenue sharing in 2025, a significant financial gap still exists between the men's and women's tournaments. The men's tournament generates considerably more revenue.

NIL stands for Name, Image, and Likeness. Recent changes allow college athletes to profit from their name, image, and likeness through endorsements and sponsorships, offering some compensation, though not directly from the NCAA.

Arguments for paying players center on fairness given the substantial revenue generated by their athletic performance, the exploitation of unpaid labor, and the need to address the existing gender pay gap. Proponents highlight the players' contribution to the success of the tournament.

Search Anything...!